Wednesday, April 09, 2008

This Just In

Please note the highlighted text as well as the story itself:


The following exchange between atheist activist Rob Sherman of Buffalo Grove and Ill. Rep. Monique Davis (D-Chicago) took place Wednesday afternoon in the General Assembly as Sherman testified before the House State Government Administration Committee.
[...snip...]
[...C]onsider what the outcry would have been if a lawmaker had launched a similar attack on the beliefs of a religious person.

Davis: I don’t know what you have against God, but some of us don’t have much against him. We look forward to him and his blessings. And it’s really a tragedy -- it’s tragic -- when a person who is engaged in anything related to God, they want to fight. They want to fight prayer in school. I don’t see you (Sherman) fighting guns in school. You know? I’m trying to understand the philosophy that you want to spread in the state of Illinois. This is the Land of Lincoln. This is the Land of Lincoln where people believe in God, where people believe in protecting their children.… What you have to spew and spread is extremely dangerous, it’s dangerous--

Sherman: What’s dangerous, ma’am?

Davis: It’s dangerous to the progression of this state. And it’s dangerous for our children to even know that your philosophy exists! Now you will go to court to fight kids to have the opportunity to be quiet for a minute. But damn if you’ll go to [court] to fight for them to keep guns out of their hands. I am fed up! Get out of that seat!

Sherman: Thank you for sharing your perspective with me, and I’m sure that if this matter does go to court---

Davis: You have no right to be here! We believe in something. You believe in destroying! You believe in destroying what this state was built upon.

Sherman didn't budge, continued his testimony related to Gov. Rod Blagojevich's oddly misdirected $1 million grant intended for Pilgrim Baptist Church, (story) and later told me he "felt like Rosa Parks."

Funny thing, most places that mentioned this story didn't mention about those eeeeevil g-u-n-s. 'Cos religion, hey, that's fair game; but guns? Ew.

I have always figured freedom of religion included those folks who have none at all. The issue can be pushed too far on either side and it frequently is; but lawmakers telling citizens their views ought to be quashed is plain wrong.

Story found here via some gunblogger links. I was only going to comment on the high-handedness of lawmakers, until I got to the transcript and found Authorized Journalists enabling hoplophobia (or at least sweeping it under the rug) yet again.

8 comments:

  1. Interesting juxtaposition between a "smite the unbeliever" attitude on the one hand, and "ban the evil guns" on the other.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Obviously, Davis does NOT believe in Praise The Lord and Pass The Ammunition.:)

    All The Best,
    Frank W. James

    ReplyDelete
  3. rx, i linked to your post (hope that's ok) and thought this seemed like a perfect tie-in and example...jtc

    http://poetnthepawnbroker.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Interesting juxtaposition between a "smite the unbeliever" attitude on the one hand, and "ban the evil guns" on the other."

    Which leads one to wonder with what, exactly, she plans on smiting the unbeliever. Prayer hankies?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Monique Davis is ... to say the least
    ... interesting. She has the ability
    to do a tirade at the drop of a hat.
    She is one often chosen to "initiate"
    new House members. They'll introduce
    a bill, and she's the one chosen to
    tell why it's an affront to reason,
    God, and everything else. Her
    constituents apparently keep
    supporting her, but elsewhere in the
    state the mention of her name brings
    rolling eyes. Don in downstate.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I tagged you, but won't be offended if you don't respond, or you can save it for a slow day...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ooo, a hoplophobia enabling problem...

    I bet some Socialism can fix that up good as new!

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not be visible until approved. Arguing or use of insulting or derogatory language will result in your comment going unpublished: no name-calling. Comments I deem excessively partisan will not be published.