Sunday, March 17, 2013

Background? Check.

     The more I think about, the more it makes sense to me that you ought to have to fill out a 4473 and pass a NICS check to become Commander-In-Chief.

     C'mon, Gramps has to do so to buy a .410 shotgunette at the Wal-Mart, why shouldn't the guy with his finger on the "blow up the world or just some guy" button have to?

     (Clearly riffed from Sarah Palin's CPAC speech; say what you will about her, she is still reliably making heads explode on the Left.)
at

10 comments:

  1. NAVIGATORMarch 17, 2013 at 10:03 AM

    INTERESTING THAT POTUS COULD NOT PASS
    ENLISTMENT MUCH LESS COMMISSIONING
    BACKGROUND CHECKS YET WE HAVE ALLOWED
    HIM TO BE CINC ALSO MEMBERS OF CABINATE /STAFF LACK VETTING AS REQUIRED BY LAW WHY HAS THERE BEEN NO HUE AND CRY ABOUT THIS AS WELL AS NO ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT PERTAINING TO THE BETRAYAL OF THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE "TO SUPPORT PROTECT AND DEFEND
    THE CONSTITUTION" WHICH APEAR TO BE TRASHED BY THEM EVERY DAY

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JohninMd.(HELP!)March 17, 2013 at 1:51 PM

      Because, Navigator, that's the way the Democrats and the media(but I repeat myself) want it. This is a point the GOP and libertarians - big and little "L" - have been lax in persueing, the naming of "Oath-breakers" as he cretins they are. 'Course, a lotta RINOS fit that tag as well....

      Delete
  2. Fuzzy CurmudgeonMarch 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM

    Sarah making heads explode on the Left is always a good thing. I'd still vote for her, if for no other reason that I think I'd expect her to put people who knew what they were about in positions of public trust...unlike the current occupant, whose criteria appear to be "what can you do for ME" as opposed to "what can you do for the people, your employers?"

    ReplyDelete
  3. Fuzzy CurmudgeonMarch 17, 2013 at 12:12 PM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dave in IndianaMarch 17, 2013 at 2:47 PM

    Actually Nav & John, if I remember correctly, articles of impeachment originate from the Senate. With O's mini-me acting as Senate majority leader an AOI vote would have as much chance as a budget bill created by the house.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Old NFOMarch 17, 2013 at 3:52 PM

    Good point, and I can only agree!

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousMarch 17, 2013 at 5:47 PM

    Actually Dave, articles of impeachment originate in the House of Representatives. Once the office holder is "impeached" he goes on trial in the Senate with the Chief Justice presiding.

    davek

    ReplyDelete
  7. fast richardMarch 17, 2013 at 9:16 PM

    Sarah Palin's speeches are entertaining. I can't say the same for the current White House occupant.

    ReplyDelete
  8. JD RushMarch 18, 2013 at 8:35 AM

    Actually, I'd be in favor of not passing the 4473 disqualifying people from holding public office. Minorities and MAIG members hardest hit.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Fuzzy CurmudgeonMarch 18, 2013 at 3:33 PM

    Maybe politicians should be licensed rather than gun owners.

    ReplyDelete

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not be visible until approved. Arguing or use of insulting or derogatory language will result in your comment going unpublished: no name-calling. Comments I deem excessively partisan will not be published.