An interesting essay -- it's a chapter from a book -- on the basic elements of morality, shared across our cultures. The piece presents itself as addressing the need for religion as a basis of morals (or at least of moral behavior), but I'm not sure that's something that lends itself to rational debate.
While moral behavior as the article defines it is shown to be its own reward, people are strongly motivated by punishment/reward structures. Assuming you believe the religion you practice -- and surely you do -- the idea of some kind of cosmic scorekeeping and reckoning-up is a very strong impetus to do right.
While I will happily argue that it's not the only source or foundation for moral behavior, no religion that I know of is inherently immoral, at least towards co-religionists and most often towards other people as well. I'll join with the Founders and Framers in believing religious faith in general to be of public utility, while refraining from singling any out. I don't happen to practice one (and I like to believe my behavior is nevertheless moral) but I'd sure hate to live someplace where religions were banned.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not be visible until approved. Arguing or use of insulting or derogatory language will result in your comment going unpublished: no name-calling. Comments I deem excessively partisan will not be published.