Wednesday, January 14, 2015

Books Semi-Reviewed

     I wanted to like Calvin Cobb, Radio Woodworker, I really did.  Even the cover art is splendid.  Roy Underhill -- yes, the PBS woodworking guy -- is a likeable fellow and handles the language well.  The good news is that his book, set in the mid to late 1930s, does a great job getting the technology and architecture right.  He starts out with an engaging cast of characters and it grows.  There are even plenty of good scenes.  But it's got problems.  The worst one is that Roy is an uncertain ringmaster -- is he writing about 1930s people and situations as seen from the 21st Century, or from the '30s?  And alas, his characters are cardboard.  Two-dimensional.  They are very good 2D characters, who would be well at home in a ripping pulp yarn...but that's not what this is; there are plenty of 3D issues in the book, not just racism, anti-semitism and 1930s political turmoil (of which the U.S. had plenty) but female soldiers (we had 'em in WW I and some were dreadfully hurt in that dreadful war), the disabled, a hint of homophobia, xenophobia, data processing and the disruptions it can cause, and just offstage, a loudly-rumored gay J. Edgar Hoover.  I don't mind if an author's politics and pet issues are different to my own -- I think Kim Stanley Robinson and Ursula K. LeGuin are among the best writers around, and we're worlds apart -- but I do mind that he treats his characters as more than mere plot props.  Alas, Calvin is callow, his love interest seems to have been trotted in for eye appeal and Red-flag waving, and his villain shows up late with a big ol' sign on his back reading I AM THE BAD GUY.  --Which he is, very, and better-drawn than some of the more-sympathetic characters; but we never really meet him, either.  The rest of the cast fares no better and it's a pity; they deserved better.

     Mr. Underhill gets all the details right -- he really, truly, delightfully does† -- but his big picture just doesn't work.  Torn between writing a fast-paced pulp novel and incisive social commentary, between a 1930s period piece and a modern look backwards, he ends up with not enough of either.  His story and characters suffer for it, by turns too simple and overly complex, sometimes in the same paragraph.  Better luck next time and I do hope there is one.

     In contrast, a couple of books set in roughly the same period of time and written long afterward by people who had Been There and Done That hold up very well.  Mary Motley's Devils In Waiting relates her time in the French Congo, where her husband served as a military attache.  By present-day standards, her attitude towards the locals can seem at times shockingly patronizing; but she does genuinely care.  She's even aware of the dreadful death toll* of the then recently-completed railway that remains the country's lifeline, though she never fully connects the dots between the somewhat wrecked and demoralized populace and the forced labor that built the railway.

     Canadian writer Thomas H. Raddall has a deft touch, well-shown in The Nymph And The Lamp, set in Nova Scotia and on Marina Island in 1920-21.  Something of a romance (but don't worry, fellows, there's no mooning around), one of the main characters is a wireless operator who has served on Marina for many years.  It's a much deeper story than first appears and with Raddall's first-hand experience in the merchant marine and early wireless (including the shore station on the real-life counterpart of Marina), there's not a wrong note.  He neither shys from nor obsesses over issues of class, race and the social and personal upheaval occasioned by the Great War, all of which you will find in background and foreground.  Highly recommended, both to my readers and particularly to Roy Underhill.  Thomas H. Raddall should be better-known and and his books more widely available in the States than they are; Amazon.ca lists quite a few that Amazon.com does not.
______________________________
* Between 30,000 and 15,000 depending on who you trust, and that's only the workers.  The toll in families uprooted or torn apart and their casualty rate is unknown. Bypassing the impassible rapids of the lower Congo has had immense benefits but the human cost was horrifying.
  
† With one exception: unless I missed something, he doesn't quite get the complex issues around the use of transcriptions in early radio.  This is about as hair-splitting as geekery gets and it won't bother most readers.

3 comments:

  1. Although I have only read two LeGuin books, I was impressed with both. I was particularly taken with the success strategy in a world with no property rights in Dispossessed. The other book I read was Lathe of Heaven, also good. Any recommendations from a fan of what a good next read might be? Thanks in advance.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Left Hand Of Darkness is a classic, set in the same Hainish Cycle universe as The Dispossessed. I enjoyed her more recent Hainish book, The Telling. And for some rare LeGuin whimsey, Changing Planes is fun. I'm not a big fan of her "Earthsea" fantasies. LeGuin is a woman of her place, time and class, but she manages to bootstrap out of it from time to time; a lot of libertarians get fussed over her harsh treatment of a capitalist nation in The Dispossessed while missing that she built her own ideal utopia on Annares and then mercilessly pointed out the ways in which it falls short. We may disagree in many ways but she's not stupid or shallow, and handles the language beautifully.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "We may disagree in many ways but she's not stupid or shallow, and handles the language beautifully."

    Ms. Le Guin is an honest recounter by her own lights, a most respectable thing. I am fond of "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas," which is just the thing to lay bare for an undergraduate audience the ultimate inhumanity of utilitarianism.

    ReplyDelete

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not be visible until approved. Arguing or use of insulting or derogatory language will result in your comment going unpublished: no name-calling. Comments I deem excessively partisan will not be published.