Thursday, July 27, 2023

On Writing

     Over on what used to be Twitter, I had a guy who kept asking me about the software I use to write.

     It's a stranger question than it might appear to be.  The software anyone uses to write is between their ears.

     Past that, the pencil, pen, typewriter, word-processing appliance, app or computer software you use to get words down is freakin' irrelevant.  There is no magic software that will make you a better writer.  None of it will organize your thoughts for you.  Some of it will check your spelling and grammar, but so will your grandmother.

     The most important thing about being a writer is to write.  If you don't do that, you aren't one.  And you'll have to do a lot of bad writing before you'll be any good at it -- just like any other skill.

     This comes up with firearms: people try with hardware to acquire skills that can only be gained through practice and good instruction.  If you want to be a good shot, you have to pay attention to instructors who know how it is done, and then you need to go to the range and shoot.  Will a fancy target pistol or laser or red dot sights make you a better shot?  Not if you haven't learned and applied the basics of grip, trigger control, lining up the sights and not flinching.  You're going to be lousy at it for a long time before you'll be any good.  Until you have the basic skills, that red dot sight won't help.  Once you have them, yes, better hardware helps -- but it can't carry you.  Start with a .22 pistol with iron sights, get training and shoot often.  Graduate to a .22 double-action revolver.  Master that, and you'll have a good start toward being able to keep shots in the 10-ring with anything.

     A dedicated text-entry appliance, like an old AlphaSmart or "the Writer," or any new Freewrite model or similar is a great tool for getting words into a file -- but it's just a glorified notepad.  A good word processor, like Pages, LibreOffice or Word, is wonderful for cutting and pasting text, but it can't help you with story structure.  It won't tell you what to cut and what to keep.  Scrivener is amazingly powerful for assembling a novel or other long-form work -- but it won't create narrative arcs for you or lead your story to a satisfying resolution.  And the more complex the tool, the longer the learning curve. 

     Start simple.  Learn the basics.  Practice, practice, practice.

     And remember: "Steal a person's wallet and they'll be poor until the next payday.  Encourage them to write for a living and they'll be poor all their life."  For every Stephen King, there are a few thousand would-be H. P. Lovecrafts, living in a garret and eating cold beans.

5 comments:

  1. Writing Tips from Finding Forrester
    as condense in https://medium.com/@MeghanGL/writing-tips-from-william-forrester-833685be614

    ReplyDelete
  2. I've written about 50000 words. I know this isn't enough, but I haven't the stomach right now for more. I've finished about four and a half novels, and when people ask me if I'm a writer, I have to say no. Maybe in the future. Good luck to you!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Over the years, I've used longhand, a typewriter, and various versions of WordPerfect, beginning with 5.1.

    Writing's hard. Editing is worse.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Aw, it's simple: just stare at the page or screen until your eyes bleed, and write using the blood as ink.

    Sometimes stories just arrive. Especially if I have thought about them a lot beforehand. Other times, well, those are good times to edit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm editing one semi-finished work because two others have reached the "where do I go from here" stage. One on the latter ones is on the third version because I didn't like where it had gone.

    You're right, sometimes the stories seem to go where they want and it's like being a steno for where the story's coming from.

    ReplyDelete

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment will not be visible until approved. Arguing or use of insulting or derogatory language will result in your comment going unpublished: no name-calling. Comments I deem excessively partisan will not be published.