Look, there are all kinds of deck-chairs-on-the-Titanic arguments to be had over definitions, over if a street-gang drive-by is the same as a nutjob/racist opening fire in a crowded place or a robbery that goes off the rails with the assailant killing multiple people, if a politically motivated nutter is the same as or different to a plain old nutty nutter.-- Yeah, all of that.
But the fact is that we have too many, and the fact is that the media --
and our own horrified fascination -- keeps making the perpetrators famous, keeps analyzing their social media presence and poring over whatever written screeds or video rants they had left behind. Then everybody circles back to their previously-held position, "too many guns" or "not enough police," "insufficient and underfunded mental health resources" or "these people aren't getting physically disciplined enough in childhood" or "nobody voted enough for my guy/my ballot initiative in the last election," or whatever.
Yeah, yeah, whatever. But what we've been doing -- and we've been doing all of it, in various states and cities -- is not working. There seems to be a rise recently in people willing to step up and take action -- heroic, personally dangerous action -- and maybe that will help. We need to accept that in a country where civilian firearm ownership is both a protected right and a centuries-old tradition, the supply of guns isn't going to change much no matter what laws are passed; in a country where health care is not a government-run gimme and where we're not in the habit of clapping the merely strange into mental institutions, we're not going to stop many of the dangerously crazed or habitually violent ahead of time. We
can stop making them famous; we can stop dwelling on them and start mocking them. Detestation and horror are normal reactions, but there are plenty of abnormal people who admire the ability to elicit them and the Internet has made it possible for such people to find one another.
Mockery seems like a frail tool compared to sending out squads of cops or even teams of kindly mental health professionals. Mockery doesn't advance anyone's political agenda or work towards the wildly varying outcomes we have, severally and each, decided we'd like to achieve. But it makes 'em look like fools and losers.
Other than an immediate -- and by definition, at least slightly late -- reaction to the perpetrator of such violence as it happens, mockery is really all we've got. All the other tools in the box have shown themselves to be useless for the job. Thoughts and prayers do nothing. Strict gun laws in California and New York City don't stop it. Widespread firearm ownership and carry in Texas and Michigan doesn't keep it from happening. Where individuals have been willing -- and able -- to step up, the carnage has been limited, but it's got to start before anyone can stop it. The people who kill en masse want to be big. They want to be famous, respected, to have a name among their peers whoever they are (or think they are). Take that away. Make them small. Make them not merely contemptible but risibly contemptible.
Mass k-llers are punks and losers before they take action; if we're going to keep on splattering their crimes across the media, make it clear that when they do harm, they become even worse losers and even more craven punks.