I'm hearing a lot of reports -- some of them first-hand -- of men, mostly young, saying -- often, shouting -- rudely sexist things to women, also mostly young.
There's no point in quoting any of it. You can easily find that information online if you're curious. The words are intended to demean, to disempower and to anger.
A frequent justification for this behavior is "Trump won," implying that, by extension, an extreme social conservatism won. And hey, he did win, with a definitive electoral college victory. But that system is designed to produce decisive results with population-weighted winner-take-all outcomes in most states. As a whole, your fellow Americans expressed a much closer opinion: 75,551,895 for Mr. Trump and 72,372,332 for Ms. Harris, a difference of two percent.*
So for all practical purposes, even if you read the results as every Republican voter wanting the ladies limited to church, children and kitchen, that's only half of the voters -- and the other half, Democrat voters, opted for a female candidate who (among other issues) had pledged to support women's abortion rights as established under Roe v. Wade prior to Dobbs. We're all locked in this room together, the debate is not over, and dunking on people doesn't advance anyone's argument.
Approximately sixty percent turnout means we don't know the opinion of forty percent of the voting age adults, and adjusts the results to be 30% one way, 29% the other and 40% wondering if it's lunchtime yet.
A recurring trope in the 1960s-70s science fiction I grew up reading was War Between The Sexes and from Philip Wylie to Joanna Russ and beyond, it never ended well. It won't if we run the experiment at full scale in real life, either.
________________________
* Professional drivers, closed course; do not attempt to hand-tally the votes in your basement. These results are not entirely final, but they're not going to change much.
BUILDING A 1:1 BALUN
4 years ago
No comments:
Post a Comment