Say there was program with an actual track record in reducing big-city violence. Not a new restriction on firearms, not a "stop and frisk" policy skirting the Fourth Amendment, not a massive increase in police boots on the ground or more midnight basketball--
You'd think the high-profile "gun violence prevention" groups would be all in favor of it, right?
"Not our lane," says the Brady Campaign. At Bloomberg's "Everytown For Gun Safety," home of the big wallet, "We're focused on...how to improve the laws." The same program was talked about offstage during the most recent series of Executive Branch pushes for gun restrictions...but mention of it never passed Presidential or Vice-Presidential lips.
Pro Publica -- dependably left-leaning -- covered this last Fall. Democratic Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who has been beating the gun control drum pretty hard, has never breathed a word about it.
I don't know, maybe it's not much of an idea -- but a program that focuses not on the gun nor punishment after the crime, but on the men mostly likely to become killer or victim, sounds like it might have some merit; given the groups that don't think enough of it to pony up a single thin dime or ten seconds in a speech, it sure seems to me it's worth looking at.
What if there was a way to reduce the inner-city death rate and nobody cared? Yeah, yeah, Pro Publica, sack'o'pinkos, etc., and no doubt theirs is a very favorable reading of the data; but even a blind sow finds an occasional ear of corn.
The Problem With Captains
3 weeks ago