In the aftermath of the mass shooting in Lewiston, Maine,* news outlets from National Public Radio to Fox News are referring to the Shelter In Place order while the shooter remains at large as a "lockdown."
It is nothing of the sort. Nothing's locked and violation of the order, while risky, is a misdemeanor at most. In fact, there's little legal ability for authorities to "lock down" the general citizenry.
This sloppiness began during the pandemic, when business closures and stay-home recommendations were widely referred to as "lockdowns," as if our towns and cities were schools -- or prisons. And those limits didn't even restrict leaving one's home or neighborhood; they were intended to drastically reduce social contact, not travel.
In Maine, the Shelter In Place edict is trying to keep people out of the way of a tense situation, in which armed law enforcement personnel search for an armed -- and probably delusional -- criminal suspect. They don't want you in the way -- or in the crossfire.
No one is saying it but there's a good chance the suspect is already dead by his own hand. "A good chance" is no basis for suspending a manhunt for a killer, nor is it a sufficient reason to tell your Uncle Chauncey he can go walk the dog while police with drawn weapons are combing his town.
But it's not a "lockdown." We don't live in a country where the government has the power to lock down a whole city or neighborhood for days -- and we shouldn't get ourselves in the habit of speaking and writing as if they do.
__________________________
* In which, yet again, a person known to be in need of mental health treatment had access to guns and used them to commit horrific acts. Many commentators have wondered why he was able to have guns; fewer have asked why he wasn't getting serious, hands-on, in-patient treatment for his mental problems. This is someone who was hearing voices and experiencing violent ideation. The United States has always had a lot of guns; we have not always had so many troubled, problematic people making criminal use of them. Guns are a contentious issue, with all kinds of legal and political entanglement; mental health, not so much -- maybe we ought to get people working together on that instead of snarling the same old bumper-sticker slogans at one another? Yeah, don't hold your breath.
Update
3 days ago
1 comment:
This morning (Sunday) the headline writer(s) at Fox don’t know the difference between importing and exporting.
Post a Comment