It's been all over the news, all over social media -- junior Senator for Oklahoma Markwayne Mullin offering to fight Teamsters President Sean O'Brien in the course of a Senate committee hearing. He was chided by his Senate colleague Bernie Sanders, a man never overly concerned with decorum, practicality or even reality, which ought to have been humbling but probably wasn't.
Senator Mullin and Teamsters boss O'Brien have been sniping at one another for months; I don't expect them to be great pals, not the former owner of a big, open-shop plumbing company* and union guy, not a Republican Senator and a labor boss: they're natural antagonists. However, politics is the tool we invented so we don't have sort matters out by knocking one another over the head, and I do expect a United States Senator and the President of a national union to avoid actual physical conflict, even while being about as lousy to one another as they can manage.
The Teamsters are proud of their roughneck image -- but even they have had to admit that might doesn't necessarily make right. I damned well expect a U. S. Senator to understand it. Tolerating this sort of behavior is a very poor sign for the present course of the GOP. Senator Mullin citing as precedent pro-slavery Representative Preston Brooks beating anti-slavery Senator Charles Sumner with a cane after Sumner had spoken harshly of slave owners in 1856 does not speak well of him -- the incident is generally understood as the one of the precursors to the Civil War. The Senator also mentioned President Andrew Jackson's overly-pugnacious behavior, which is shaky ground indeed; Jackson's legacy is at best, mixed, and his temper is more infamous than admired.
I don't expect Senators -- or even U. S. Representatives -- to engage in hand-to-hand combat or feats of strength. That's not what I'm paying them to do; it's what I am paying them to avoid, and to manage the conflicts that would otherwise lead to violence.
This bully-boy nonsense is strictly for the funny papers. Or the history books, brown/silver/black shirts and all. (Can you name the countries where each group sullied the public streets?)
______________________
* The plumber's union is a big one, one of the surviving 19th Century American Federation of Labor craft unions,† and historically, they're known to be quite touchy about jurisdiction.
______________________
† In contrast to the younger, scrappier Congress of Industrial Organizations unions. They're long merged now, but while an AF of L craft union organized workers in skilled trades, the CIO (splintering from AFL in 1935) organized entire establishments, from the sweepers to the top of the hourly pay scale. There was no love lost between craft unions and industrial unions for twenty years, but by the mid-1950s, they remembered they had a common enemy and got back together.
Update
3 days ago
2 comments:
Let's see if I have this right: Germany/USA/Italy (although I believe the UK had their own Black Shirts, they were wanna-bes compared to the Italians)
It ain't just news media that's gotten hooked on clickbait.
As Tam linked on her page, "Spewing transgressive, shocking, attention-grabbing falsehoods that get people riled up and confirm their angriest or darkest passions*" also works for politicians. Especially those making a play for the Ignorati vote.
*Jonah Goldberg
Post a Comment