Sunday, January 26, 2025

Don't Know Why I Bother

     There was a point during the pandemic when I stopped doing confrontational debunking.  People had their minds pretty well made up, right or wrong, and they were not going to change -- and some of them were starting get threatening.

     I try to not have strong attachments to anyone or anything (it's that Jr. High flirtation with Buddhism), and to not share too much about the stuff I really love if it's where other people can get at it.  I was always dislikeable: nearsighted, clumsy, stroobly-haired, a tomboy who never knew when to shut up.*  It's never nice to discover someone's poured milk in your school locker, glued your Lord of the Rings paperbacks into a series of solid lumps or keyed your car.  I learned to keep things shut away.  At my present age, I would prefer to retain all the teeth I have left and not suffer any more broken bones -- little things, I suppose, but such comforts.

     Nevertheless--  It irks me when molehills are inflated into mountains.  The Federal Emergency Management has been a prime focus for political extremists from the day it was proposed. If they stock up on house trailers, they're said to be planning concentration camps.  If they ask for bids to supply body bags, they're accused of plotting mass death.  FEMA workers are often greeted with hostility when they show up after calamity has struck, accused of being too slow (States usually have to ask for 'em) or too snoopy (it's a government agency; they have forms that have to be filled out) or of doing things they have never done.  (And I get it, it's nervous-making when The Gummint shows up; my Mom was a township property tax assessor, which occasionally meant having to measure the outside dimensions of somebody's house.  Not everyone was okay with that.)

     So I had a blog comment about how FEMA had left Trump supporters in the lurch, and that comment needs to be addressed.

     In the aftermath of disaster, people are on edge.  Armed with a clipboard and a cellphone or radio, FEMA workers have been known to encounter residents who have rather more armament.  I gather the advice they are given is to avoid confrontation.

     In early October of 2024, Hurricane Milton roared from the Gulf and across Florida, killing at least 35 people and doing over 30 billion dollars in damage.  Afterward (some sources say October 27), a FEMA supervisor of 11 canvassers working in Lake Placid, FL told them not "avoid confrontation" but to skip houses with Trump campaign signs.  She got caught; someone leaked the email and by November, she was fired and FEMA sent a new crew to cover the area.  Short write-up here, news stories here and here.  Any search engine will find more.  FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell was hauled up before the House Oversight committee, where she condemned the supervisor's action.  Jamie Raskin of Maryland called the instruction "a bad mistake, legally and constitutionally, which violated the core mission of FEMA and every federal agency to work on behalf of all Americans. [...] It’s plainly wrong and divisive to use a presidential campaign lawn sign as a proxy for someone’s dangerousness," and that's the ranking Democrat on the committee calling it out.  The Republicans said much the same thing.

     That is the sole documented example I can find of FEMA being partisan.  Some crazy rumors came out of North Carolina after their terrible floods, but it appears to be social-media fantasy.

     Here's what FEMA says: "FEMA provides assistance to survivors regardless of race, color, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, religion, age, disability, English proficiency, political affiliation or economic status." They've got a whole fact sheet you can look over -- and if you've got evidence they're not playing by their own rules, there's a "contact us" link right there at the bottom of the page.  Cc the House Oversight Committee while you're at it, I'm sure they'll be interested.

     Or you can huff the fumes of overheated bullshit, if that's what gets you high, but don't confuse the resulting hallucinations with reality, and don't ask the rest of us to take a whiff.  The stink is unmistakable.
_______________________
* One of the first signs of trouble with my ex was when we were building a little platform at my previous home to get the house for the feral cats up out of the mud, and it became obvious he wasn't much good with a handsaw and had trouble sinking a nail straight.  It took me by surprise; I think of those as basic life skills, stuff my big sister, little brother and our parents knew before adulthood.  He was...not real happy that it surprised me.  I'll take half the blame for that, but, um, it was a warning of basic incompatibility we both should have heeded.

7 comments:

Dena Hankins said...

Long-time lurker says right? And thanks. You rock.

Anonymous said...

I would debunk you argument, but you don't want to hear it, and will likely censor what I have to say if I do, so I won't.

But look at the differences between the FEMA response in Appalachia and the LA fires.

Roberta X said...

"Censor?" Dude, this is my blog; deciding what I will or won't publish is an editorial act, not censorship. Perhaps you have mistaken me for a government.

The onus is on you: Precisely what differences in FEMA response? Do you have any citations? Are they opinion pieces, or do they present factual data?

I spent the morning looking at news stories about FEMA. What do you have besides snide innuendo? This "You don't want to hear it" guff is preposterous: I am always interested in facts. I'm not interested in half-baked, partisan opinions. Let's see your links. Ante up or fold -- your bluff has been called.

Alvin/Maine said...

Lol I love reading your blog. Agree 100 percent with you. It is YOUR blog and if I present here you have right to censor or correct me. And you(including me) should come with facts. Which you do. If I present a opinion, it is MY opinion. I don't expect you to rollover and agree with me if you don't share my opinions. We have spared in the past...

Roberta X said...

I need to clear something up:
Not getting a comment published by the person running a blog is not censorship. It is an editorial decision. You are not prevented from expressing your opinion elsewhere -- on your own blog, on social media, scrawled on walls, whatever.

Censorship is when some person, group or government keeps you from expressing yourself at all. When a bully beats you up and threatens to do worse if you tell anyone? Censorship. When the government tells the press not to publish your stuff, or claps you in jail for yelling it on streetcorners? Censorship. When Russia chased the "TV Rain" channel out of their country and tried to block it on the Internet? Censorship.

But when an editor or publisher (etc.) tells you, "Nope, we won't publish it," that's not censorship and you are free to take your material somewhere else.

People have become special, tender snowflakes over this. It's a sure sign they have never submitted unsolicited work, which has about a 99% rejection rate.

grich said...

I don't have time to research it, but the disaster in Appalachia was unique in the way that so many roads...and big ones...were washed out. One of the interstate highways just got limited two-way traffic last week. You can't rebuild bridges overnight, nor can you replace the washed-away hill the road was sitting on. If the roads are gone, it makes a timely response much harder. In LA, many homes were destroyed, but the road infrastructure remained mostly intact.

It's hard to compare the socio-economic landscape between the LA and Appalachia events, also.

I am surprised the FEMA response in LA hasn't been shut down...I'm wondering when Trump will declare CA to be a "shithole" and not bother with it, like he did with Puerto Rico during his first term.

RandyGC said...

The primary difference I've seen in the Fed response to CA came from the then President making a statement (not sure if it was ever followed up on) that the Feds would "make whole" the damages there for 6 months.

Don't know if that was a typical Politician feel good statement, or a garble of already existing programs, but that was way above FEMA's level.

If there is a difference in response, it's most likely due to the difference in the environments. The size of the impacted area for instance.

From what I've seen, the ability of people and supplies to move in and out of the affected areas in CA is not degraded much (once burned out cars were bulldozed off the streets). whereas in NC roads, bridges and other basic infrastructure no longer exists or needed checking to be sure it could be used safely.

One of these things is not like the other