In one sentence, it's a Kurt Russell action movie. But that description falls extraordinarily short of the mark; the script expects, and Russel delivers, a full character arc from sociopathic alienation to genuine empathy in just over a hundred words of dialog and just under a hundred minutes of running time.
The setting is a star-spanning, near-future civilization, if you define "civilized" loosely enough. The set and texts both sub- and overt are rife with references to other films, notably Blade Runner and much of Russell's œuvre. At least for me, this made the background seem deeper: the flashes of "Russellized" backstory didn't remind me of the films but rang with disorienting familiarity. (Borrowing works both ways: the child-soldier training sequences in this movie were mirrored a few years later in James Cameron's Dark Angel.)
If you have much of a military background (or a logical turn of mind), OpFor's stategy, tactics and command structure are as laughable as the antics of heavies in a bad King Fu movie, but for sheer storytelling, the film punches well above its weight. Bonus: nobody ever stops to point out the features of the Mk. IV/A non-McGuffin. Sets and settings are very good and -- sadly -- the hyper-fascist future sketched in seems more likely in light of current events. Interestingly, you could file dates and some names off and drop this film neatly into the Firefly universe without crumpling a fender. (Or, for that matter, into H. Beam Piper's Terro-Human Future History, which has a number of parallels to the setting for Firefly.)
This film neatly illustrates what cinematic SF can and should do: in print, the story would be at best a novella, not a novel. It's a cracking good way to spend a sleepy Sunday afternoon; the scriptwriter and Russell put his scant lines and copious screen time to very good use advancing the arc. If you were after deeply deep subtlety, perhaps you should've chosen something with subtitles.
BUILDING A 1:1 BALUN
4 years ago
8 comments:
I've got a copy of Soldier and watch it every couple of years because it does hold up well. Like a lot of movies the climactic finale seems a little bit rushed.
You mentioned novella; a friend and I were discussing movies, etc. recently, and we both concurred that a movie generated from the gentle expansion of a short story always seemed better than one hacked down from a full length book. At the time I was thinking of the "The Thing" movies (1951- The Thing From Another World; 1982-Carpenter's The Thing; 2011-The Thing) but there are plenty of examples.
Something I've always wondered about with that movie, toward the end did they cut in an audio sound byte of Robert Plant wailing in the beginning of Led Zeppelin's Immigrant Song or am I just hearing things?
I heard it, too. This is a fairly common SFX in-joke.
I'll watch anything Russell is in.
Fun fact, he is one of the last studio system trained actors (Disney) still working.
So many good scenes and lines in that film.
Always thought of this as an underrated movie. I thought it odd that a main character talked so little, but there was no problem understanding him.
They did make movies that way for many years, Joseph. ;) It seemed to work.
One of my favorite ones for years, and I still watch it again and again. I understand all of it, and know it is True.
I agree. Underrated and highly enjoyable.
Post a Comment