And here I am, inside of my head blank as an eggshell.
Let's see, I recently read the remaining three books in Gregory Maguire's "The Wicked Years." Yes, there are sequels to Wicked, continuing his revisionist history of Oz. (Son Of A Witch, A Lion Among Men and Out Of Oz.)
Eminently readable books, though if you were looking for clear-cut heroes and villains and acts of unalloyed evil or goodness, better look elsewhere. If the original Oz books are read as a history for children, a history written as the 19th Century ticked over to the 20th with all the cultural and sociopolitical baggage that entails, then Maguire's books should be understood as a recently-written history for grown-ups. Events unfold with the complexity and ambiguity of real history, neatly fitted around L. Frank Baum's original work.
While the books are liable to do a little overwriting of your childhood memories of magical visits to Oz, I recommend them.
BUILDING A 1:1 BALUN
4 years ago
3 comments:
Enjoyed Wicked. Son of a Witch not so much.
Of course, I never read the Oz books as a kid, and didn't really enjoy The Wizard Of Oz when it made it's annual appearance on our TV, either.
WV: sespin. One orbit out from Bespin.
SoaW was a bit of a slog -- but I wanted to read the Cowardly Lion's story, so I pressed on. It was worth it.
I absolutely adored Wicked, but same as Drang, was not so fond of Son Of A Witch. Loved tik-tokism, and the stuff about animals and Animals. Quite clever. Will check out the new one. :)
Post a Comment